ju4 ren4 zhi1 li4 shi1 shi4 zhe3 (CognitiveAgent)
A SentientAgent with responsibilities
and the ability to reason, deliberate, make plans, etc. This is
essentially the legal/ethical notion of a person. Note that, although
Human is a subclass of CognitiveAgent, there may be instances of
CognitiveAgent which are not also instances of Human. For example,
chimpanzees, gorillas, dolphins, whales, and some extraterrestrials
(if they exist) may be CognitiveAgents.
Ontology
SUMO / BASE-ONTOLOGYSuperclass(es)
Subclass(es)
ren2 lei4
zu3 zhi1 dan1 wei4
Constrains relations
xiang1 xin4
fu4 yu3 yi4 wu4
fu4 yu3 quan2 li4
kao3 lv4
ji4 qiu2
gu4 yong4
shi1 shi4 zhe3 you3 yi4 tu2
xu1 shi3...wei2 zhen1
you3 quan2 shi3...wei2 zhen1
zai4 zhu4 yi4 fan4 wei2 zhong1
zhi1 dao4
xu1 yao4
zhu4 yi4 dao4
pian1 ai4
xiang3 yao4
Related WordNet synsets
- personhood
- being a person: "finding her own personhood as a campus activist"
See more related synsets on a separate page.
Axioms (5)
If proc shi4 yi4 xiang4 xing4 li4 cheng2 de5 shi2 li4, then there exists ju4 ren4 zhi1 li4 shi1 shi4 zhe3 agent so_that_not proc shi4 agent de5 shi1 shi4 zhe3.
(=>
(instance ?PROC IntentionalProcess)
(exists
(?AGENT)
(and
(instance ?AGENT CognitiveAgent)
(agent ?PROC ?AGENT))))
If learn shi4 xue2 xi2 de5 shi2 li4 and learn shi4 agent de5 shi1 shi4 zhe3, then agent shi4 ju4 ren4 zhi1 li4 shi1 shi4 zhe3 de5 shi2 li4.
(=>
(and
(instance ?LEARN Learning)
(agent ?LEARN ?AGENT))
(instance ?AGENT CognitiveAgent))
If agent shi4 ju4 ren4 zhi1 li4 shi1 shi4 zhe3 de5 shi2 li4, then agent ke3 yi3 ren4 jue2 se4 shi1 shi4 zhe3 zuo4 tui1 li3.
(=>
(instance ?AGENT CognitiveAgent)
(capability Reasoning agent ?AGENT))
If communicate shi4 gou1 tong1 de5 shi2 li4, then there exist na4 rong2 zai4 ti3 obj,ju4 ren4 zhi1 li4 shi1 shi4 zhe3 agent1,ju4 ren4 zhi1 li4 shi1 shi4 zhe3 agent2 so_that_not obj shi4 communicate de5 shou4 shi4 zhe3 and communicate shi4 agent1 de5 shi1 shi4 zhe3 and communicate (bu2) zhong1 jie2not(s) agent2.
(=>
(instance ?COMMUNICATE Communication)
(exists
(?OBJ ?AGENT1 ?AGENT2)
(and
(instance ?OBJ ContentBearingObject)
(patient ?COMMUNICATE ?OBJ)
(instance ?AGENT1 CognitiveAgent)
(agent ?COMMUNICATE ?AGENT1)
(instance ?AGENT2 CognitiveAgent)
(destination ?COMMUNICATE ?AGENT2))))
If disseminate shi4 san4 bu4 de5 shi2 li4, then there exist ju4 ren4 zhi1 li4 shi1 shi4 zhe3 agent1,ju4 ren4 zhi1 li4 shi1 shi4 zhe3 agent2 so_that_not disseminate (bu2) zhong1 jie2not(s) agent1 and disseminate (bu2) zhong1 jie2not(s) agent2 and agent1 deng3 yu1 agent2.
(=>
(instance ?DISSEMINATE Disseminating)
(exists
(?AGENT1 ?AGENT2)
(and
(destination ?DISSEMINATE ?AGENT1)
(instance ?AGENT1 CognitiveAgent)
(destination ?DISSEMINATE ?AGENT2)
(instance ?AGENT2 CognitiveAgent)
(not
(equal ?AGENT1 ?AGENT2)))))