Next: Disturbance feed-forward on the
Up: Disturbance feed-forward control
Previous: Disturbance feed-forward control
  Contents
Disturbance feed-forward on the controller
According to Figure 11.1 the disturbance
will feed via the transfer function
to the controller,
which will compensate the influence of the disturbance.
Figure 11.1:
Block diagram of the feed-forward on the controller
 |
From this diagram the controlled variable directly follows as
 |
(11.1) |
With some manipulations one obtains from this
 |
(11.2) |
which gives
 |
(11.3) |
where for brevity the argument
is omitted. From the transfer functions of
Eq. (11.3) one can see that the
characteristic equation is
 |
(11.4) |
with regard to disturbance behaviour and
 |
(11.5) |
with regard to the reference behaviour. The disturbance will be
fully compensated if
 |
(11.6) |
from which the required transfer function for the feed-forward element is
 |
(11.7) |
This approach can only be realised by a controller if the
pole excess of
is not larger than
that of
. Otherwise a total
compensation
is not possible. Moreover, the polynomial
must be
Hurwitzian.
For the frequent case that the disturbance and control behaviour
are equal, i.e. the case of
, the transfer function
of the feed-forward elements is
 |
(11.8) |
As the total compensation of a disturbance in a plant with
P behaviour is only possible by a controller
with I behaviour, the transfer function of the feed-forward
element, according to Eq. (11.8), should thus show ideal
D behaviour. If there is a PI controller in the loop, the feed-forward element
must be designed as a
element.
Often the feed-forward element cannot be realised as ideally
designed according to Eqs. (11.7) or (11.8),
because
, besides pure I behaviour, normally contains
delay elements. Also in these cases a
element is recommended.
Next: Disturbance feed-forward on the
Up: Disturbance feed-forward control
Previous: Disturbance feed-forward control
  Contents
Christian Schmid 2005-05-09