Next: Application of the design
Up: Design of controllers using
Previous: Characteristics in frequency and
  Contents
Controller design using frequency domain
characteristics
The relations
(
) derived in the
previous section for the closed loop behaviour of a
element, can be applied also to higher-order systems as long as
these systems have a dominant pair of poles. For this class of systems an
efficient synthesis method exists as shown in the following. The
starting point of this method is the representation of the
frequency response
of the open loop on a Bode diagram. The
specifications of the closed loop that must be met are first
given as characteristics of the open loop according to the above
section. The synthesis requires in the choice of a
controller transfer function
, which
modifies the open-loop transfer function such that the required
characteristics are met. The method consists of the following
steps:
-
- Step 1: In general, the characteristics of the
time response of the closed loop,
,
and
, are given. On the basis of these values
from Table 7.1 the gain
, from the rule of
thumb for
according to
Eq. (9.23), the crossover frequency
and
from
the
phase margin
will be determined, and from
the
damping ratio
.
- Step 2: First a P element will be chosen as
controller such that the gain
determined during step 1
will be met. By inserting additional elements in series (often
called compensator or correction elements)
will be changed such that the other values from step 1,
and
, can be achieved while the
amplitude response
decreases by
20
/decade in the vicinity of
the crossover frequency
.
- Step 3: It must be checked whether the
response meets the required specifications. This can be performed
directly by determining
,
and
by simulation, or indirectly by using the formula in
section 9.1 for the
resonant peak
according to Eq. (A.25) and the
bandwidth
according to
Eq. (9.16). These values must be verified by
calculation of the closed-loop frequency domain characteristic
from the open-loop characteristic. In the case of too large
deviations from the approximations of
and
, step 2 must be repeated in a modified form.
This method does not inevitably deliver a proper controller during
the first run and it is a trial-and-error method that leads
generally to satisfactory results after some recursions.
For the design of this controller the methods given in
section 8 for a standard controller are usually not
sufficient. The controller must be composed of different elements
- as shown above in step 2. In this procedure two special
elements are of important interest, which have to perform a phase
shift as shown below:
a) The lead element
The increasing phase shift element is used to increase the phase
in a certain frequency range. The
transfer function of this element is
 |
(9.26) |
For
the frequency response
 |
(9.27) |
follows with the two
breakpoint frequencies
 |
(9.28) |
and
 |
(9.29) |
A further characteristic is the frequency ratio
 |
(9.30) |
From Eq. (9.26) the frequency response
follows. The Nyquist plot is shown in Figure 9.12 and it is a
semicircle.
Figure 9.12:
Nyquist plot of a lead element
 |
The maximum phase
shift
can be determined from the condition
for
 |
(9.32) |
As shown by the Bode plot in Figure 9.13 the lead element
has at high frequencies an undesirable increase in the magnitude response of
Figure 9.13:
Bode diagram of the lead element
 |
If Eq. (9.26) is broken down as
the lead element consists of a parallel connection of a P element
with gain 1 and a
element, which is a special
controller (compare
Eq. (8.9)).
For the
step response one obtains
 |
(9.34) |
which is shown in Figure 9.14.
Figure 9.14:
Step response of the lead element
 |
For the practical design of lead elements the normalised phase
diagram in Figure 9.15 is helpful. If the frequency
is known, from this diagram the frequency ratio
can be determined.
The lower breakpoint frequency
can be either read
from the diagram directly or calculated from
Eq. (9.32).
Figure 9.15:
Normalised phase responses of the lead element:
;
;
;
=
lower
breakpoint frequency;
= upper breakpoint frequency;
normalised phase responses of the lag element:
;
;
;
=
lower
breakpoint frequency;
= upper breakpoint frequency
 |
Example 9.2.1
The phase response of a transfer function must be shifted by

at

.
The maximum of the phase shift of

is
from Figure
9.15 for

and

. With

follows for the lower
breakpoint frequency

or
from Eq. (
9.32)

and with Eq. (
9.30) for the upper breakpoint frequency

.
b) The lag element
The lag element is used to decrease the magnitude response above a certain
frequency. Hereby a undesirable decrease of the phase response occurs in a
certain frequency range. The
transfer function of this lag element is
with  |
(9.35) |
For
and the
breakpoint frequencies
and
the frequency response is
 |
(9.36) |
Also in this case a frequency
ratio can be defined as
 |
(9.37) |
The decrease of the amplitude response at high frequencies is
 |
(9.38) |
Figure 9.16 shows the Nyquist plot and
Figure 9.17 the Bode diagram of the lag element. The
Figure 9.16:
Nyquist plot of the lag element
 |
Figure 9.17:
Bode diagram of the lag element
 |
rearrangement of Eq. (9.35) into
 |
(9.39) |
shows that the lag element consists of a parallel connection of a
P element with gain
and a
element with gain
and time constant
. The step response
of this lag element follows from Eq. (9.39) as
 |
(9.40) |
and is shown in Figure 9.18.
Figure 9.18:
Step response of the lag element
 |
It is easy to see that this relation is equal to
Eq. (9.34) but with
. For practical working
the phase diagram of Figure 9.15 can be used, which is
in this case in principle the same as that for the lead element
but with different parameters and flipped over.
Example 9.2.2
The magnitude response

of an open-loop
system should be decreased at

by 20

,
whereby the maximum phase shift must be 10

. From
Eq. (
9.38) it follows that

and from this

. With

and

one obtains
from the phase response

, and
with

for the
breakpoint frequencies

and

.
Next: Application of the design
Up: Design of controllers using
Previous: Characteristics in frequency and
  Contents
Christian Schmid 2005-05-09